Where’s the “Art” in Architecture? Navigating Efficiency and Minimalism at Central Washington University

Embracing Efficiency and Minimalism

A prevalent trend in the constantly changing field of architecture is the move toward efficiency, modernity, and minimalism. Although this strategy surely helps reduce energy use and increase accessibility, there is a growing worry that many contemporary structures lack the inherent charm and mystery that architecture can provide. As we witness the transformation of campuses and cityscapes, the question arises: Where is the "art" in architecture?

The campus of Central Washington University (CWU) is a prime illustration of this architectural development. The Language and Literature (L&L) building is a solid structure that dates back to the late 1960s and is a well-known sight on campus. Home to the English, philosophy, and foreign language departments, L&L was more than just a functional space; it was a piece of architectural history.

Approximately a year ago, the announcement came that the venerable L&L building, alongside Farrell Hall, would be replaced by the new North Education Complex. Admittedly, L&L had its flaws - it was old, inefficient, inaccessible, and plagued by leaks. The decision to replace it was rooted in practical considerations, acknowledging that the building required more repairs than it was worth.

Preserving Architectural Legacy in Transition

However, the essence of the debate lies in the artistic and unique qualities that L&L brought to the campus. For long-time Ellensburg locals, the building was not just a structure but a recognizable landmark with a whimsical and artistic charm. As a child, the building may have resembled a fantasy castle guarded by a fearsome dragon, and as one grew older, it retained a fantastical allure.

For the author, who has been a part of the Ellensburg community for most of their life, L&L served as a quiet escape during their early days as a nervous Running Start student. With time, as they declared a major and joined the English department, L&L became a familiar haven where classes were held, professors' offices were located, and a sense of belonging was fostered.

The concern at the forefront of this discussion is the transition to streamlined, cookie-cutter designs seen in structures like the North Education Complex. A visit to CWU's website reveals an image of the proposed building - a minimalist structure that seamlessly aligns with the current architectural trends on campus. However, what sets it apart is precisely what raises concerns. L&L's distinctiveness, its deviation from the campus norm, is seemingly lost in the design of the new complex.

The Artistic Essence Lost in Transition

The author expresses a preference for buildings that tell stories through their architecture. While acknowledging that the new building need not replicate L&L's complicated and confusing layout of L&L, they argue that the North Education Complex lacks the artistic essence that made the former building unique.

The central proposition is that it's possible to create buildings that maintain architecture's thought-provoking, artistic aspects while simultaneously being energy-efficient, accessible, and easy to understand. The author contends that there should be no need to compromise artistic architecture to seem modern.

As we grapple with the ongoing evolution of architectural styles, the article invites readers to consider the delicate balance between modernization and preserving the artistic soul of buildings. It makes us wonder if we can design buildings that enhance our surroundings' cultural and aesthetic fabric and fulfill utilitarian purposes. Let us not overlook the artistic quality that can inspire us and help us feel connected to the places we live in the race for efficiency.